#The hit list 2011 trial
#The hit list 2011 free

#The hit list 2011 free

The sight of free people applauding the presidentвЂ™s discretionary killing of citizens would have horrified the framers of our Constitution. intelligence officials said it did not matter because they were authorized to kill Americans in such operations. Derwish was not even on a hit list, but U.S. Cole) dead, Derwish was riding in the car with him (as well as four other individuals). While Bush wanted Yemeni Abu Ali al-Harithi (the alleged mastermind behind the 2000 bombing of the U.S. citizen, Kamal Derwish, in Yemen in 2002. Bush, who ordered an attack that killed U.S. ObamaвЂ™s hit list is a continuation of a policy defended by George W. It is the very definition of authoritarian power вЂ“ and Americans appear to have developed a taste for it. When confronted on the lack of knowledge of who is on this list and the basis for their killing, the Obama administration simply says that citizens must trust their president. Even if one assumes citizens would only be killed outside the country, it would mean that a your life becomes dispensable the minute you step a foot over one of our borders.ДЄt the same time, the government has expanded the definition of terrorism and material support for terrorism, which in turn further expands the scope of possible targets. So a president can now kill a citizen without publicly naming him as a target, stating the basis for his killing, or even acknowledge his killing once it has been carried out. While few people mourn the passing of a figure like al-Awlaki who was accused being a leader in al Qaeda, they should mourn the passing of basic constitutional protections afforded to all citizens. The Obama administration succeeded in arguing that the planned killing of a citizen on this hit list was a вЂњpolitical question,вЂќ not a legal question. At the time, the Justice Department argued that if al-Awlaki wanted judicial review, he should file with the clerkвЂ™s office himself вЂ“ despite an order for him to be shot on sight. government with al-Awlaki, it was a hearing that the intelligence agencies likely did not want to occur. Due to reported prior associations of the U.S. citizens killed because a president unilaterally declared them to be part of a terrorist organization.Д«efore the killing, Obama successfully fought efforts by al-AwlakiвЂ™s family to have a court review the legality for the planned assassination of their kin. They did so last week in Yemen вЂ“ and killed U.S.-born cleric Samir Khan for good measure. President Obama never denied that he told the military to kill Anwar al-Awlaki on his sole discretion a year ago.

#The hit list 2011 trial

citizens without a trial or even a formal charge and the public applauded. Last week, Americans saw a curious sight for a free nation: their president ordered the killing of two U.S. Notably, Ron Paul (who has emerged as the only candidate discussing these issues from a civil libertarian perspective) suggested an impeachment inquiry based on the killing of the two citizens. Ironically, the day after I wrote the Los Angeles Times column on ObamaвЂ™s disastrous impact on the civil liberties movement in the United States (including his assertion of the right to kill citizens on his own authority), the U.S.

Below is todayвЂ™s column in USA Today (to run in paper form on Wednesday) on President Barack ObamaвЂ™s claim to the right to kill citizens as dangers to the nation.